Not My Stonewall.
Erasure of people of colour in a Hollywood feature is
nothing new. Nor is the tired practice of casting a cisgender man in the role of
a Transgender Female character. Roland Emmerich’s Stonewall movie however takes
erasure to new heights. The 1969 stonewall uprising was by all means the
turning point for LGBT liberation
The stonewall uprising it ‘self was not an Isolated incident
but rather another in a series of protest actions in major cities across the
United States of America the earliest occurring a decade before stronewall at
Coopers Doughnuts in Los Angeles. This was followed by other direct actions
throughout the United States most being led by Transgender Women of colour. Its
important to realize the class as race distinctions played a huge part in LGBT
oppression during this era. Rich Homosexual men tended to suffer under the
anti-gay laws in the USA during this time period. Working class Queers suffered
far more than the rich and Queer people of Colour faced discrimination even
within the LGBT community (some would argue they still do to this day). Trans
people were themselves seen as bellow most of the gay community. And Homeless
Trans women of colour very much bore the brunt of the anti LGBT laws of that
time.
The stonewall story can’t be told properly without understanding
the dynamics of oppression that caused not only stonewall but also the
preceding actions of the prior decade. Without this basic understanding the
Roland Emmerich movie is nothing more than a Hollywood fantasy that shares only
the name and location of a significant historical event.
Comments